- #Bwanadik mac mac os x
- #Bwanadik mac mac os
- #Bwanadik mac install
- #Bwanadik mac 32 bit
- #Bwanadik mac upgrade
#Bwanadik mac mac os
Wow! Talk about a multi-layered environment!Īnd this will actually still allow AppleTalk and Ethernet to reach the outside world via TunTap, from within Mac OS 9.0.4? This way, the only thing that needs to keep support going is VirtualBox, and your actual environment can just happily run along in the background. MESS also has some PPC emulation that is also not complete yet.Īdespoton wrote:Only sort of what I'm really suggesting is running OS X 10.6 inside VirtualBox, and run SheepShaver/9.0.4 inside that. QEmu will hopefully be able to run 9.2.2 (and 10.4 with Classic) at some point in the future, but that work isn't complete yet. Using a PowerPC Mac running 10.4.11 or earlier SheepShaver running 9.0.4 (either inside VirtualBox or on the host) Your choices for running Classic Mac PPC software are currently: VirtualBox is a virtual environment on existing architecture - meaning 10.4 Intel will run on VirtualBox 4.3.6, but 10.4 for Intel didn't run Classic, because Classic is a virtual environment for running Mac OS 9.2.2 inside OS X PPC.
#Bwanadik mac 32 bit
I like to keep a work around in case Apple drops 32 bit support as simple as possible, all I need OS9 for is to run some old software like HyperCard, no internet, no printing (except PrintToPDF) and no support for gaming is required.
This way, the only thing that needs to keep support going is VirtualBoxĪm I right in thinking with VirtualBox it is also possible to use OSX 10.4 (Tiger) skip Sheepshaver and use the build in Classic environment of OSX 10.4 for running OS9 ? Since VirtualBox doesn't do 3D acceleration all that well on OS X, it wouldn't be a good choice for gaming, but it's perfect for running SheepShaver in OS X 10.6.Īdespoton wrote:> what I'm really suggesting is running OS X 10.6 inside VirtualBox, and run SheepShaver/9.0.4 inside that.
#Bwanadik mac install
If you like, you can even install the Clover bootloader, and you'll be able to use your guest OS environment on any computer (running OS X/Windows/Linux) that uses an Intel-compatible architecture.
#Bwanadik mac upgrade
installed, and you know that whenever you upgrade your host OS (or computer), no re-configuring is needed. VirtualBox 5.x also supports volume encryption.Īnd the added benefit is that this internal system can have TunTap etc. Plus, moving this virtual system to another computer is as simple as exporting to OVA, then importing it on the new system. It also means you can snapshot the entire environment before making changes, to enable really simple rollback (or even switching between two configuraitons). Only sort of what I'm really suggesting is running OS X 10.6 inside VirtualBox, and run SheepShaver/9.0.4 inside that. > So are you suggesting that I can just as easily run Mac OS 9.0.4 from within a VM like VirtualBox, as I currently do with SheepShaver? I am not an old school gamer, or anything like that. I only use SheepShaver to run my old Hermes II BBS and my old Hotline server. So are you suggesting that I can just as easily run Mac OS 9.0.4 from within a VM like VirtualBox, as I currently do with SheepShaver?
#Bwanadik mac mac os x
Not bad at all for a free package.īut considering what a headache it was for me to get networking to work properly between Mac OS X and Mac OS 9.0.4/SheepShaver earlier this year - I had to install TunTap and do other stuff - I can only wonder what frustrating challenges I would face if I am eventually forced to move from SheepShaver to VirtualBox, or some other virtual host app. It was fairly easy to set up VirtualBox when I tried it out some time ago. I have no need of it otherwise, because I don't run any Windows OSes on my machine. Well, I suppose that one of these days I may have to install VirtualBox again. I keep a copy of OS X 10.6 in a VM, and it's useful for compiling software that runs on all versions of OS X, as well as for running older emulators. Adespoton wrote:That's why we've got virtual machines
0 kommentar(er)
